Bus Types: Slack, PV, and PQ
Every bus in a power flow study is classified as one of three types: Slack, PV, or PQ. This classification determines which quantities you specify as inputs and which the solver computes.
Understanding bus types is essential for setting up power flow cases correctly and interpreting results.
The Core Idea
At each bus, there are four electrical quantities:
- $P$ ā real power injection (MW)
- $Q$ ā reactive power injection (MVAR)
- $|V|$ ā voltage magnitude (p.u. or kV)
- $\theta$ ā voltage angle (degrees or radians)
Power flow is a system of $2n$ equations (for $n$ buses), so we need $2n$ unknowns. At each bus, we must specify two quantities and solve for the other two.
| Bus Type | Specified (Known) | Solved (Unknown) |
|---|---|---|
| Slack (Ref) | $|V|$, $\theta$ | $P$, $Q$ |
| PV (Generator) | $P$, $|V|$ | $Q$, $\theta$ |
| PQ (Load) | $P$, $Q$ | $|V|$, $\theta$ |
PQ Bus: The Load Bus
Most buses are PQ buses. These represent:
- Load points (substations, industrial customers)
- Buses with no generation or voltage control
What's Specified
You tell the solver:
- $P$ ā real power consumed (negative injection)
- $Q$ ā reactive power consumed
What's Solved
The solver finds:
- $|V|$ ā resulting voltage magnitude
- $\theta$ ā resulting voltage angle
Physical Interpretation
PQ buses model constant power loads ā loads that draw a fixed amount of P and Q regardless of voltage (within reason). This is realistic for most loads over normal voltage ranges.
Example
A substation with 50 MW load and 20 MVAR reactive consumption:
- $P = -50$ MW (negative = consuming)
- $Q = -20$ MVAR
- $|V|$ and $\theta$ = solved by power flow
PV Bus: The Generator Bus
Generator buses with voltage control are PV buses. These represent:
- Power plants with automatic voltage regulators (AVRs)
- Synchronous condensers
- STATCOMs and other voltage-controlling devices
What's Specified
You tell the solver:
- $P$ ā real power output (dispatch setpoint)
- $|V|$ ā voltage magnitude setpoint (what the AVR maintains)
What's Solved
The solver finds:
- $Q$ ā reactive power needed to maintain voltage
- $\theta$ ā voltage angle
Physical Interpretation
Generators have governors that control $P$ (real power output) and exciters/AVRs that control $|V|$ (terminal voltage). The reactive power $Q$ adjusts automatically to maintain the voltage setpoint.
Key insight: At a PV bus, reactive power is a result, not an input. The generator produces whatever $Q$ is needed to hold voltage at the setpoint.
Reactive Limits
Real generators have reactive capability limits:
$$Q_{\min} \leq Q \leq Q_{\max}$$
If the solved $Q$ exceeds these limits, the bus converts to PQ at the violated limit:
- If $Q > Q_{\max}$: Fix $Q = Q_{\max}$, let $|V|$ drop
- If $Q < Q_{\min}$: Fix $Q = Q_{\min}$, let $|V|$ rise
This is called PV-PQ switching and is handled automatically by power flow solvers.
Example
A 200 MW generator with voltage setpoint 1.02 p.u. and reactive limits ±100 MVAR:
- $P = 200$ MW
- $|V| = 1.02$ p.u.
- $Q$ = solved (say, 45 MVAR needed to maintain voltage)
- If $Q$ would need to be 150 MVAR, the bus switches to PQ with $Q = 100$ MVAR
Slack Bus: The Reference
Every power flow needs exactly one slack bus (per synchronous island). This special bus:
- Sets the angle reference ($\theta = 0$)
- Absorbs power mismatch (losses + any imbalance)
What's Specified
- $|V|$ ā voltage magnitude (like a PV bus)
- $\theta$ ā voltage angle (typically set to 0°)
What's Solved
- $P$ ā real power injection (whatever's needed to balance the system)
- $Q$ ā reactive power injection
Why Is It Necessary?
Two fundamental reasons:
1. Angle Reference
Voltage angles are only meaningful relative to a reference. Without fixing one angle, the solution is not unique (all angles could shift together).
2. Loss Absorption
The total generation must equal total load plus losses. But we don't know losses until we solve the power flow! The slack bus provides the "swing" generation to cover this unknown quantity.
$$P_{\text{slack}} = \sum P_{\text{load}} + P_{\text{losses}} - \sum P_{\text{other gen}}$$
Choosing the Slack Bus
Typically the slack bus is:
- The largest generator (provides most "swing" capacity)
- The system's major interconnection point
- A bus near the electrical center of the network
Practical tip: Slack bus choice affects the solution distribution of losses but not the physics. If the slack $P$ comes out unreasonably large, your input data may be unbalanced.
Example
A large coal plant serving as slack bus:
- $|V| = 1.0$ p.u.
- $\theta = 0°$ (by definition)
- $P$ = solved (e.g., 450 MW to balance the system)
- $Q$ = solved (e.g., 120 MVAR)
Summary Comparison
| Aspect | PQ Bus | PV Bus | Slack Bus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical use | Loads | Generators | Reference generator |
| Knowns | $P$, $Q$ | $P$, $|V|$ | $|V|$, $\theta$ |
| Unknowns | $|V|$, $\theta$ | $Q$, $\theta$ | $P$, $Q$ |
| Controls | Nothing | Voltage magnitude | Angle reference, power balance |
| Count | Most buses | Generator buses | Exactly one per island |
The Mathematical Picture
Power flow solves $2n$ nonlinear equations. For an $n$-bus system with:
- 1 slack bus
- $n_G$ PV buses
- $n - 1 - n_G$ PQ buses
We have:
- $(n-1)$ unknown angles (slack angle fixed)
- $(n - 1 - n_G)$ unknown voltage magnitudes (slack and PV magnitudes fixed)
Total unknowns: $(n-1) + (n - 1 - n_G) = 2n - 2 - n_G$
The power balance equations provide:
- $(n-1)$ real power equations (slack P not constrained)
- $(n - 1 - n_G)$ reactive power equations (slack and PV bus Q not constrained)
The system is square: same number of equations and unknowns. ā
GAT Bus Types
In GAT's Arrow format, bus type is stored in the type column of buses.arrow:
| Value | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PQ | Load bus |
| 2 | PV | Generator bus |
| 3 | Slack | Reference bus |
| 4 | Isolated | Not connected |
When you run gat pf, GAT:
- Reads bus types from the network
- Sets up equations based on types
- Handles PVāPQ switching if generators hit limits
- Reports slack bus P and Q in the solution
Common Mistakes
Forgetting the Slack Bus
Power flow will fail with "no slack bus" or produce nonsense. Every synchronous island needs exactly one.
Multiple Slack Buses
Having two slack buses over-constrains the problem. Only one bus can set the angle reference and absorb mismatch.
Ignoring Reactive Limits
If a PV bus solution shows $Q$ outside limits, the voltage setpoint cannot be maintained. Enable PV-PQ switching or adjust limits.
Wrong Sign Convention
Remember: positive injection means generation, negative means consumption.
- Load bus: $P < 0$, $Q < 0$ typically
- Generator bus: $P > 0$, $Q$ = whatever's needed
Key Takeaways
- PQ buses specify $P$ and $Q$; solve for $|V|$ and $\theta$
- PV buses specify $P$ and $|V|$; solve for $Q$ and $\theta$
- Slack bus specifies $|V|$ and $\theta$; solves for $P$ and $Q$
- Every synchronous island needs exactly one slack bus
- PV buses can convert to PQ when reactive limits bind
See Also
- Power Flow Theory ā The equations solved for each bus type
- Newton-Raphson Method ā How the solver handles bus types
- Y-Bus Matrix ā Network representation used in power flow
- Glossary ā Quick definitions